Spring Into Action Fundraising Drive

Thanks to all our Touchstone and Salvo friends who responded so generously and helped us surpass our goal!
God bless you all.











WWW Mere Comments





« A Word from Chris | Main | Hogwarts' IT Director Resigns »

July 24, 2007

Cross? What Cross?

     I've recently been strapping on the swamp boots to wade through something called Glory and Praise, perhaps the most commonly used Roman Catholic hymnal in the United States and Canada.  Oh, it is sloppy and noisome work, logging the bathos, stupidity, banality, heresy, and textual vandalism.  I've concluded, though, that there is one factor that touches every problem, something that helps explain these apparently disparate acts of mischief:

-- the neutering of old masculine language about mankind and even God
-- the heedless fouling up of the old poetry, to update a "thou" and a "thee"
-- the seizing of every chance to talk about dancing (not to be found in the New Testament, I suspect, unless it's Salome) and about the motherhood of God"
-- in general, the louche emphasis upon feelings, not repentance, but soft and syrupy feelings
-- the blithe arrogation of God's words to ourselves, speaking in the first person
-- the arrogation of God's grace and majesty to ourselves: "We are the Bread, we are the Body"
-- the celebration of our own wonderfulness, and the decrying of sin -- that is, other people's sins
--
the abandonment of traditional liturgical forms, traditional poetry and song -- all relegated to the status of the "old fashioned," for trotting out, like Grandmama's silver, at certain feasts, and that's it
-- the passing along of counterfeit "folk" music, actually performance music, like "Do You Remember the Kind of September," only not nearly as good
-- the mincing baby-talk in the verses, along with a bogus primitivism, a la the Indians in Hollywood: "You are child of the universe."

It's narcissism, all of it.  It's the pretty boy at the side of the pool, gazing upon his image in the water, ignoring his parents, the woman in love with him, the reality of the world around him.  He wants to remain a pretty boy forever -- he wants a disembodied "union" with no ties to the past, no duties to his fellows, and no law to obey.  It's music that encourages a choir full of American Idols, shimmying and shaking and calling attention to themselves, while envying one another (I'll bet some of our bloggers have stories about infighting among the twenty self-appointed soloists of a "Christian" choir).

     What's missing from the hymnal?  Oh, music, poetry -- and one thing above all: the Cross.  The Cross sure does seem a fine cure for narcissism.  In all our arguments about ordination and (in the Catholic church) lay "ministry," nobody ever says, "I want the right to be ordained a priest because I demand to be crucified!"  Or, "I want to serve as a lector because I want to be crucified!"  Hardly -- these things and many more are considered clerical plums that everybody ought to be able to pop in the mouth, if they choose.  We are Church, don't you know, not to mention Bread and Body and God Almighty.  If there is a single new "hymn" that is written in the shadow of the Cross, encouraging the taking up of what will leave your back stooped and your shoulders cut with splinters, I haven't seen it.  Meanwhile, a part of my own crucifixion seems to be the necessity of listening to it all, and watching the performers.  Silence would be infinitely better.

Posted by Anthony Esolen at 11:18 AM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5ee953ef00e008de670b8834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Cross? What Cross?:

Comments

My impression is that the Gather hymnal is worse. At least the music we actully sang in the Gather parish was worse than the music we actually sang in the Glory and Praise parish.

SFP

Posted by: Susan Peterson | Jul 24, 2007 11:51:19 AM

For the Sunday School lesson this week (filling in for a vacationing teacher) I tackled "Pilgrimage" as a theme, and was constrained to photocopy lyrics from "out of date" hymnals to get the examples I wanted to use. And we're conservative Presbyterians! We haven't adjusted to lefty-biased standards - just dumbed-down and "modernized" - goodbye, "Jordan's Stormy Banks", nor may we "raise an Ebenezer" anymore.

It's much like the teaching of history in government schools: agendas do some harm, especially by rendering the subject itself boring - but trying to make the subject "accessible" sometimes does even more harm.

Posted by: Joe Long | Jul 24, 2007 11:53:46 AM

Introducing the cross into Christian worship has this one eminent thing to recommend it: It has never been tried before.

Posted by: Mairnéalach | Jul 24, 2007 12:13:10 PM

I seem to remember a few hymns mentioning something about it. Even some new ones.

Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Jul 24, 2007 12:24:26 PM

I have made my own peace by simply refusing to sing out of the Gather hymnal. I don't attempt any longer to determine whether this song or that is heretical or not, corrupted by PC (the worst non-word in the language is "Godself"), narcissistic dreck, or whatever. It is a simple, liberating conditional expression:

if (hymn in Gather) then silent ();

that mostly keeps my teeth from grinding and my thoughts toward God. I can't stopper my ears against the miked lounge-act emoting of my liturgical "betters", however, so it's not a perfect solution.

Posted by: craig | Jul 24, 2007 12:36:04 PM

The Trinity hymnal, which is a conservative Christian hymnal (PCA) has changed a lot of the words too. This really aggravates me because I am a cradle Baptist and have memorized most of the old words. My kids get embarassed when I don't sing what is written. But sorry, when we sing "Revive Us Again" and the words in the book say something else, I am singing the old words.

Posted by: JeanB | Jul 24, 2007 12:45:58 PM

Hey, why don't we have a good grumpy touchstonian snobbery contest? Catholic vs. Protestant. You Catholics come up with the worst Catholic song you've had to sing (or listen to sung) in church before. And we'll come up with the worst Protestant one.

Once we narrow down the nominations, we'll vote on the absolute worst song - and settle this old which-is-the-true-church-and-who-are-the-godless-heretics thing once and for all!

(Or maybe, rather than voting, we'll just ask the Pope which is the worst...doh!)

Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Jul 24, 2007 12:47:15 PM

Beat this, Glory and Praise:

So Close

I'm so secure
You're here with me.
You stay the same
Your love remains
here in my heart.

(Chorus)
So close I believe
You're holding me now,
in Your hands I belong.
You'll never let me go;
So close I believe
You're holding me now
in Your hands I belong,
You'll never let me go.

You gave Your life
and Your endless love.
You set me free
& show the way
now I am found

(Chorus)

(Bridge)
All along You were beside me
even when I couldn't tell
and through the years
You showed me more of You
more of You

(Chorus)

Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Jul 24, 2007 12:56:44 PM

This is precisely the argument made by Thomas Day in Why Catholics Can't Sing. See his chapter 5, titled "Ego Renewal" and especially the comments on the "reformed-folk style" of music so omnipresent in the Catholic Church in America today.

Posted by: Darel | Jul 24, 2007 12:57:52 PM

We poor fragmented continuing Anglicans with our tiny parishes have two things to boast of: our 1928 prayerbook and our 1940 hymnal. These do not change; they will not be replaced. We have kept all our thees and thous, our masculine pronouns, our real music -- and our orthodoxy.

Posted by: Judy Warner | Jul 24, 2007 1:00:36 PM

I just returned from a week at a music and dance camp in Massachusetts. Probably most of the people there were pagans. The only acceptable religious expression seemed to be eastern. I took an early morning Tai Chi class out of curiousity. (It was boring.) At the end, the teacher said a few words, and told us to give thanks to our inner selves. That struck me as the be-all and end-all of narcissism and I said as much to a woman I was walking back with. I added that I am a Christian. She said, "Then you can give thanks to your inner Christ."

What can you say?

Posted by: Judy Warner | Jul 24, 2007 1:04:42 PM

Our hymnbook is one thing...but when you introduce the Overhead Projector, well, that's a whole 'nother one.

Jeanb, I also sing the Original Words when I remember them (which I generally do), and I say "For us men and our salvation", "the quick and the dead", and the rest of the creed as literate people knew it.

Posted by: Joe Long | Jul 24, 2007 1:07:14 PM

"if there is a single new hymn written in the shadow of the Cross..."

How about Townend's 1995:


How deep the Father's love for us, how vast beyond all measure
That he should give his only son, to make a wretch his treasure
How great the pain of searing loss, the Father turned his face away
As wounds which mar the chosen one, bring many sons to glory

Behold the man upon a cross, my sin upon his shoulders
Ashamed, I hear my mocking voice call out among the scoffers
It was my sin that held him there until it was accomplished
His dying breath has brought me life; I know that it is finished

I will not boast in anything: no gifts, no power, no wisdom
But I will boast in Jesus Christ; his death and resurrection
Why should I gain from his reward? I cannot give an answer
But this I know with all my heart: his wounds have paid my ransom

Posted by: Thomas Dunbar | Jul 24, 2007 1:40:26 PM

this sunday i heard forever young at mass...talk about liturgical crimes

Posted by: alex | Jul 24, 2007 1:54:08 PM

my favorite, tho not new, is the Charles Wesley:

1 WRETCHED, helpless, and distrest,
Ah! whither shall I fly?
Ever gasping after rest,
I cannot find it nigh:
Naked, sick, and poor, and blind,
Fast bound in sin and misery,
Friend of sinners, let me find
My help, my all, in thee!

2 I am all unclean, unclean,
Thy purity I want;
My whole heart is sick of sin,
And my whole head is faint;
Full of putrefying sores,
Of bruises, and of wounds, my soul
Looks to Jesus, help implores,
And gasps to be made whole.

3 In the wilderness I stray,
My foolish heart is blind,
Nothing do I know; the way
Of peace I cannot find:
Jesu, Lord, restore my sight,
And take, O take, the veil away!
Turn my darkness into light,
My midnight into day.

4 Naked of thine image, Lord,
Forsaken, and alone,
Unrenewed, and unrestored,
I have not thee put on;
Over me thy mantle spread,
Send down thy likeness from above,
Let thy goodness be displayed,
And wrap me in thy love.

5 Poor, alas! thou know'st I am,
And would be poorer still,
See my nakedness and shame,
And all my vileness feel;
No good thing in me resides,
My soul is all an aching void
Till thy Spirit here abides,
And I am filled with God.

6 Jesus, full of truth and grace,
In thee is all I want;
Be the wanderer's resting-place,
A cordial to the faint;
Make me rich, for I am poor;
In thee may I my Eden find;
To the dying health restore.
And eye-sight to the blind.

7 Clothe me with thy holiness,
Thy meek humility;
Put on me my glorious dress,
Endue my soul with thee;
Let thine image be restored,
Thy name and nature let me prove,
With thy fulness fill me, Lord.
And perfect me in love.

Posted by: Thomas Dunbar | Jul 24, 2007 2:01:46 PM

Getting back to Praise & Glory hymnal though, if that IS the current parish hymnal, to what would it be reasonable to transition?

Posted by: Thomas Dunbar | Jul 24, 2007 2:07:03 PM

None of our local parishes still use G&P, Deo gratias. Even the annual paperback music issues and the hymns in the back of the missalettes (another loathesome item) are marginally preferable. Worship III didn't seem all that bad. Gather is loathesome, though at least it still has "At the Lamb's High Feast".

Posted by: franksta | Jul 24, 2007 2:16:53 PM

Alas, Townsend being a Protestant, he's not likely to be widely used among our Roman Catholic brethren. I've given permission to several of my Catholic friends to freely raid our Wesley pantry, but so far their rulers haven't taken that up.

I would like to mention that the hymnody drives away those of us who are attracted to the theological depth of Catholicism. Of course that's not a very solid reason to be repelled, but Gather isn't a terribly winsome fruit to have drooping from one's tree.

Posted by: Ethan Cordray | Jul 24, 2007 2:39:54 PM

I have collected old hymnals for a few years now (and am always on the lookout for more), and am proud to say that only two of them are from the last 40 years. One of those is a Baptist hymnal given to me by a friend and the other is my Hymnal 1982 for choir. In my mind, the older the better.

I've even got a protestant Evangelical spanish, "El Himnario" from 1931 (which I find to be a great oddity, only one I've ever seen). Some of my favorite hymnals are the ones written with shape-notes. Difficult to play, but they've got some of the best hymns.

Posted by: Isamashii Yuubi (Courageous Grace) | Jul 24, 2007 2:42:26 PM

Ethan,
Yes, I was teasing a bit. My parish uses Glory & Praise and my evangelical friends (I just entered the Catholic Church this Easter), knowing how I like Wesley, Aquinas & Townend [and Dylan] must be wondering how I take the G&P hymnody.

I'd probably pick the Collegeville Hymnal if I could say. Of course, the recent Steubenville Canticles hymnal has familiar "protestant" songs but it's way too narrow, in my opinion, as is the Adoremus hymnal (tho in another direction).

Posted by: Thomas Dunbar | Jul 24, 2007 2:51:58 PM

Ahhh, shape-notes!

"The Southern Harmony" is now online at
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/walker/harmony/files/harmony.html .Lots of great music back there.

Posted by: Joe Long | Jul 24, 2007 2:51:59 PM

Wonders, I'll take you up on your offer. This is one from the Protestant side which causes an intense rage to well up in me. To get the true horror of this 'song' you have to understand that the chorus is usually repeated ad infinitum.


Darrell Evans - Trading My Sorrows

I'm trading my sorrow
I'm trading my shame
I'm laying it down for the joy of the Lord

I'm trading my sickness
I'm trading my pain
I'm laying it down for the joy of the Lord

Chorus:
And we say yes Lord yes Lord yes yes Lord
Yes Lord yes Lord yes yes Lord
Yes Lord yes Lord yes yes Lord Amen

I'm pressed but not crushed persecuted not abandoned
Struck down but not destroyed
I'm blessed beyond the curse for his promise will endure
And his joy's gonna be my strength

Though the sorrow may last for the night
His joy comes with the morning

Posted by: David R | Jul 24, 2007 3:02:53 PM

David - yes, that one gets annoying (yes, yes, yes, yes, YES it gets annoying, yes, yes, yes,yes, AMEN.)

But surely you know worse! This one is apparently courtesy of somebody/something called "Big Daddy Weave" (no kidding):

"Fields of Grace"

There's a place that I love to run and play
There's a place that I sing new songs of praise

Chorus
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace

There's a place that I lose myself within
There's a place that I find myself again

Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace

There's a place where religion finally dies
There's a place that I lose my selfish pride

Chorus
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace

I love my Father, my Father loves me
I dance for my Father, my Father sings over me
And nothing, nothing can take that away from me

There's a place where religion finally dies
There's a place that I lose my selfish pride

Chorus
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace
Dancin' with my Father God in fields of grace

This one actually made me sing "Give Me That Old-Time Religion" all the way home, and "Give Me That Old-Time Religion" is a tremendous framework for extempraneous lyrical composition. ("Oh, it wasn't saccharine-sappy, no, it wasn't saccharine sappy! It was never saccharine-sappy - it's good enough for me!")

Posted by: Joe Long | Jul 24, 2007 3:19:08 PM

I'm curious if anyone out there knows of hymns (new or old - but I suspect I'm a fool to hope for a new one) about US forgiving OTHER folks. You know, forgiving your brothers, forgiving your enemies, that sort of stuff.

Happily, I go to a church where we enjoy hymns which do feature the cross, with titles like "Grace Greater than All Our Sins." (Actually, as far as that song goes, "Our" can just as well be understood as "My". The music is third-rate, too. But I'm not complaining.) But then, when I had someone to forgive, I wondered what it would be like to sing about ME forgiving MY BROTHER. That's one step beyond basking in God's grace for free. But, alas, I could not manage to find any such hymn in my Baptist hymnal. I hoped there might be one sunck in between the masterpieces of Isaac Watts and Fanny Crosby - but no. Which I felt to be a great omission.

Omitting the cross, I guess, is just one more step down the slope of narcissism.

Posted by: Clifford Simon | Jul 24, 2007 3:36:37 PM

sunck -> snuck

Posted by: Clifford Simon | Jul 24, 2007 3:38:24 PM

There's a wonderful old spiritual:

Not my brother nor my sister, but it's me, o Lord -
Standin' in the need of prayer!
Not my brother nor my sister but it's me, o Lord, Standin' in the need of prayer!

That's as close as it gets, perhaps. We do sing about God forgiving us; to actually sing about forgiving my neighbor might seem, well, a bit gloaty.

Posted by: Joe Long | Jul 24, 2007 3:45:08 PM

The early repertoire of modern dance is filled with enactments of Narcissus, Dionysus and the members of his retinue--Pan and the Naiads. Such are the spirits being evoked, in "love" and "freedom," by the present liturgical phantasmagoria.

One particular source of the dancing comes by way of a 2nd century Gnostic text, the Acts of John, in which Jesus and those in the know do a round dance before the Passion. Like all other Gnostics, the composer of the Acts of John couldn’t tolerate the idea that the savior actually had a real body, or, if he had encased himself in one for a while, that he hadn’t escaped it by the time of the crucifixion. So Jesus does a bait and switch, hiding himself in the Eucharistic bread before the Passion, and sends a projection or a surrogate or a puppet of himself (or a hapless Simon of Cyrene) to stand in for him on the Cross while he “jumps up high” out of his body and tricks the Pharisees et al and all of us non-Pneumatic dullards. The Acts of John was introduced to Theosophist-dilettante Gustav Holst, who wrote the “Hymn of Jesus” based on it. Then Sydney Carter took the same G. R. S. Mead text and morphed it into “The Lord of the Dance.” Nice Shaker tune, but the lyrics?—please! Nevertheless, I dare you to try to remove just this one gnarled little nugget of heretical persiflage from the repertoire of Christian contemporary hymnals. See how your music director, your choir, your pastor responds.

The Gnostic revival is progressed well beyond that, however. Last year I had the odd experience of attending my dear wife’s church (but it could have been almost any sort of church) when the adults and children of the congregation performed in the sanctuary a production of Stephen Schwartz's “Children of Eden.” Everyone else seemed to be simply charmed by how cute the kids were, singing in their animal costumes as they strolled and danced up into the ark. I seemed to be the only one who was at all disturbed by the fact that this musical play depicts the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob as a demented and bloodthirsty oaf who abuses and oppresses his children and all of Creation as well. The old coot has to have his Ur-patriarchal consciousness raised by some serious encounter sessions with the poor young woman (the playwright invented this character out of whole cloth, but hey, it felt so right) who is initially told she can’t come onto the ark because she’s not a member of Noah’s tribe and she can’t marry into the family. Do you have any doubt that I would have seemed like some befuddled mossback if I had seriously raised any sort of theological objection to the play—and spoiled the fun? Basilides would be laughing in his cups, if he were still around.

The Cross remains the scandal and the stumbling block it has always been.

Posted by: Little Gidding | Jul 24, 2007 8:00:06 PM

Ah Judy,

If only I were that kind of Anglican! Last year our church took down the wall cross (big monster from the previous church that met in our space) because the Young Life Leader was afraid it would offend some of the attendees. They couldn't be bothered to use the parish hall, which has no cross, because they "needed" the sound system. Apparently this year, they have gone on to greener pastures.

And AMiA has recently hired Andy Pearcey of Holy Trinity Brompton/ALPHA fame. When he preached at our church earlier this year, explaining his philosophy of "worship", he said he preferred the term "casual" to contemporary!

Blech, Blech and BLECH!

Kamilla

P.S. Still don't know what's "casual" about Worship.

Posted by: Kamilla | Jul 24, 2007 8:58:51 PM

20+ years ago, when I was at the U. of Chicago, Bond Chapel (the small chapel of the Divinity School -- Rockefeller Chapel being the humongous university "chapel" for official events) had a "non-sexist" hymnal in the book racks, with such choice desecrations of classic hymns as:

Praise my soul the God of Heaven;
To God's feet your tribute bring;
Ransomed, healed, restored, forgiven,
Evermore God's praises sing:
Praise God, praise God,
Praise God, praise God,
Praise our God in everything.

and

Joy to the World! Our Christ is come,
On earth, Shalom to bring!

and (from "A Mightly Fortress")

The powers of darkness grim,
We tremble not for them.

I shudder to think what may be there now.

Posted by: James A. Altena | Jul 24, 2007 9:00:19 PM

There are two images that come to my mind when singing "I'm Trading My Sorrows" - equally uncharitable and unhelpful when I'm supposed to be worshipping.

The first is a music video with scenes out of something like Mel Gibson's Passion, except that Jesus, rather than grimacing or focusing steady, is smiling and singing that song. He could be singing the "yes lord, yes lord, yes yes lord" as the nails are going in.

The other is...well...maybe I'll just tell my pastor in private confession. But suffice to say, screams of "yes! yes! yes!" ad nauseum bring other things to mind even less appropriate to church.

Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Jul 24, 2007 9:11:24 PM

All,

When you post an example of exemplary or bad music, would you mind elaborating a little on it for the sake of your more poetry-deaf brethren (like myself)? I've gained a new appreciation for what goes into church music from these discussions, but probably miss some of the nuances.

My pastor pointed out one piece that fits this thread beautifully: Michael W. Smith's "Above All." The chorus goes:

Crucified, laid behind a stone
You lived to die rejected and alone
Like a rose trampled on the ground
You took the fall
And thought of me
Above all

The last two lines are narcissism in the extreme. I was the person Jesus thought about most on the cross?

I have one question amidst all this criticism. Is it possible for some of these songs to be edifying for personal worship but not for communal settings? One example is this piece by Becky Drake:

What can I give, Lord, back to You
for the things You have given to me?
Grace beyond measure,
the greatest treasure of all, to me?

And I will surrender to You, Lord,
And when I'm weak let me be brought
To my knees; I want to choose
Your way for me
Every dream for Your feet, for Your feet
Every plan, for Your throne, for Your throne

All that I am, Lord, I give to You
Because Jesus You gave everything for me
In dying You saved me
In living You gave me Your way to be

Repeat chorus, many times

Very me-focused, with room for lyrical improvement... but sometimes I need to repeat to God and to myself, many times, that every goal of mine must submit to His will. I've found it very helpful in turning my focus to that direction.

Posted by: Yaknyeti | Jul 24, 2007 10:38:28 PM

Todd Wilken, the LCMS pastor who hosts Issues, etc., has a sermon diagnostic which he applies to selected sermons to determine what they are about and to make a judgment of their merit. Now I will admit that it might be a bit harsh to subject every single sermon to this test, but it does seem to me that it has a great deal of merit in the main. It goes like this: Was Jesus mentioned? If so, was He the subject or the object of the verbs? If the subject, what was He doing?

Seems like a good test to apply to worship music as well. Most CCM passes the first test: Jesus is mentioned. On the second test, however, the subject is often the singer, not the Lord. For the ones which pass that second test, however, the third test is often a problem, as Jesus is helping the singer live a more fulfilling life or is being the singer's sweetheart rather than his Savior dying on the cross. Having said that, I suspect a few CCMs might fair well under the test, though none come immediately to mind. Of course, there is still the issue of the music, but that has already been treated elsewhere recently.

One could argue that the Psalms would not fair well under this test, but if one reads the Psalms with Christ in mind, they do -- See, e.g., Father Reardon's Christ in the Psalms.

Posted by: GL | Jul 24, 2007 11:02:25 PM

And, yes, Joe Long, I say the quick and the dead too, though even the conservative Presbyterians have changed that too :)

Posted by: JeanB | Jul 24, 2007 11:16:19 PM

I was so inspired in my perusal of these aforementioned "cutting edge" hymnals that I, just now, wrote two new hymns. Please excuse the offensive terms used in the original hymns' titles...

1. "Onward, faith-based people!"
(Sung to the tune of "Onward, Christian [sic] Soldiers [sic]!"

Onward, faith-based people!
Moving toward "relevancy,"
With theological substance
re-imagin'd expertly.

AND,

2. Our Community's Stated Purpose"
(Sung to the tune of "The Church's [sic] One [sic] Foundation [sic]")

Our community's stated purpose
Is gracious mass-appeal,
It's in our Mission Statement
Reflecting how we feel:
No "lifestyle choice" appalls us,
C'mon you're welcome here!
Throw out that moral compass,
There's no one here to steer.

Posted by: Fr. Robert McMeekin | Jul 24, 2007 11:48:28 PM

You folks realize, I trust, that you're on the path to excommunication from the Church of What's Happenin' Now. You've been warned....

Posted by: Bill R | Jul 25, 2007 12:33:31 AM

Yaknyeti,

With regard to the song "Above All," which, incidentally, was not penned by Smith, but rather is one of those modern "worship songs" that makes its circuitous route to be covered by every "worship artist" imaginable, thus selling a few thousand albums via mass appeal at LifeWay stores...um, anyway, it was actually written by Lenny LeBlanc and Paul Baloche, though I tell you, verily, that I have a point I was making:

The last two lines as "narcissism in the extreme?" I think not. Though I cradle a particular enmity towards that song, it is not on merit of narcissism. Indeed, Kutless makes a similar note in their song "Sea of Faces" (which, for all its lyrical profundity, or lack thereof, at least still professes the presence of Christ bodily in the Eucharist) says it thusly:

If only my one heart
Was all You gained from
All it cost
Well, I know
You would have still been there
With a reason
To willingly offer Your life

I think it's more a statement of the simultaneous intimacy and omnibenevolence that is God. We are not merely parts of the whole redeemed; we are individually loved.

Posted by: Michael | Jul 25, 2007 1:54:46 AM

Yaknyeti, Michael,

I agree with you both concerning "Above All" -- it probably is not meant to be narcissistic, but I suspect that many read, sing and understand it that way.

In an attempt to deal with poor self-image counsellors will often tell a person, "If you were the only person alive Jesus would have died for you!", and this song makes the same point.

I'm just afraid that those of us who have no trouble with our self-image will take this wrongly, which is why I refuse to sing this song or to choose it for a service when I am in charge.

Posted by: Wolf N. Paul | Jul 25, 2007 2:31:54 AM

If only I were that kind of Anglican!

What's preventing you from being one, Kamilla?

Posted by: Judy Warner | Jul 25, 2007 5:48:55 AM

The hymn that especially irritates me begins "Go be justice......" Go be--what? The grammar is so incorrect, the poetry so grating to the ears and the moral injunctions soound like bureaucratic rules.

Posted by: austin | Jul 25, 2007 5:52:46 AM

I grew up in the Church of God in the Caribbean.

It is a mix of Pentacostal and Evangelical in worship.

The songs include hymns and choruses but as time has progressed far more choruses than hymns. The choruses get more banal every year and are repeated over and over.

I find it maddening and have begun attending an Anglo - Catholic church just for the retention of hymns with words I know from memory.

My experience of university in the UK during the last 5 years introduced me to new songs and while some are rubbish I enjoy some as well. The dis - satisfaction with trite, heretical lyrics seems quite widespread among the churches I attended.

I must admit to having been spared that disaster made of Praise my soul the King of Heaven mentioned above. I would have left after the first line. I have known that hymn most of my 25 years. I have never seen a gender - neutral hymnal.

This is one of my favourites and I think its contemporary.

1
See what a morning gloriously bright
With the dawning of hope in Jerusalem
Folded the grave clothes, tomb filled with light
As the angels announce, Christ is risen!
See God's salvation plan
Wrought in love, born in pain, paid in sacrifice
Fulfilled in Christ the man
For he lives, Christ is risen from the dead!

2
See Mary weeping, where is he laid?
As in sorrow she turns from the empty tomb
Hears a voice speaking, calling her name
It's the Master, the Lord, raised to life again!
The voice that spans the years
Speaking life, stirring hope, bringing peace to us
Will sound till he appears
For he lives, Christ is risen from the dead

3
One with the Father, Ancient of Days
With the Spirit that clothes faith with certainty
Honour and Blessing, Glory and Praise
To the King crowned with power and authority
And we are raised with him
Death is dead, love has won, Christ has conquered
And we shall reign with him
For he lives, Christ is risen from the dead.

I dont know enough about music to describe the tune but it is upbeat especially at the end of the stanzas declaring that Christ is risen.

The Cross is not specifically mentioned but it is there nonetheless.

Deniece

Posted by: deniece | Jul 25, 2007 9:10:16 AM

Songs about the cross may be few and far between but there are a few being written these days. Here is the chorus from one-
Oh, the wonderful cross
Oh, the wonderful cross
Bids me come and die and
find that I may truly live
Oh, the wonderful cross
Oh, the wonderful cross
All who gather here by grace
draw near and bless Your name

Written by and for the Praise and Worship crowd, but
a compelling song nonetheless.

Posted by: John Mark | Jul 25, 2007 9:31:31 AM

It seems to me that it was Fr. Neuhaus who once said that God allows bad liturgy so that western Christians living in otherwise comfortable circumstances will know what it is to suffer for the cause of Christ.

Posted by: David T. Koyzis | Jul 25, 2007 9:36:23 AM

Dear Fr. McKeemkin,
Your parody of "The Church's One Foundation" is excellent. The nonbastardized version is one of my favorite songs (lyrically it is one of the best), though my all-time favorite is probably "At the Name of Jesus". Incidentally I have a brother (Van) who worships at an OCA parish (Holy Apostles) in Columbia, SC.

Dear Thomas Dunbar,
I suspect we must somehow be related as my middle name is Dunbar (as is my father's first name). I live just north of Charlottesville now, but was raised in SC.

Posted by: Gene Godbold | Jul 25, 2007 10:04:40 AM

Who needs "Lord of the Dance" when we already have the perfectly orthodox "Tomorrow shall be my dancing day"?

Posted by: Thomas | Jul 25, 2007 10:57:04 AM

The bit attributed to Fr. Neuhaus is actually an Ambrose Bierce style definition that has been around much longer, and I've quoted on MC before:

Liturgist (n): An affliction sent by God such that, in a time of no overt persecution, no Catholic need be denied the privilege of suffering for the faith.

------------------------

Dear GL,

The rule you quote from Todd Wilken applies equally well to prayers. The so-called "ex tempore" prayers of many modern evangelicals -- which are now so hackneyed, trite, sterile, and formulaic as to not even qualify for the title "ex tempore" -- typically run:

"Father God, I/we just want to praise you for being {A, B, C} and I/we just want to thank your for [D, E, F] and I/we just ask that you would just do [G, H, J, K]," etc.

I/we is the constant subject, God the constant object, and the whole larded with a meretricious texture of false humility.

Which prayers also show what they think is meant when they say that one is "just"-ified by faith, by the prayers of the "just".

Posted by: James A. Altena | Jul 25, 2007 11:18:32 AM

Here's another bad song nomination, one I think will put protestants in the lead:

Our Love Is Loud

When we sing
Hear our songs, to You
When we dance
Feel us move, to You
When we laugh
Fill our smiles, with You

Pre-Chorus:
When we lift our voices
Louder still
Can You hear us?
Can You feel?

Chorus:
We love You, Lord
We love You
We love You
We love You, Lord
We love You
We love You

When we sing [LOUD!]
Hear our songs, to You
When we dance [ROUND!]
Feel us move, to You
When we laugh [ALOUD!]
Fill our smiles, with You

(Pre-Chorus)

(Chorus)

Bridge:
And our love is big
Our love is loud
Fill this place with this love now [4x]
And our love is big
Our love is loud
Fill our lungs
To sing it now...

(Chorus [4x])

Out:
We lift our voices louder still
Our God is near
Our God is here

--David Crowder Band
Baal-worship, anyone?

Posted by: V-Dawg | Jul 25, 2007 11:25:40 AM

"...Glory and Praise, perhaps the most commonly used Roman Catholic hymnal in the United States and Canada.
...
Meanwhile, a part of my own crucifixion seems to be the necessity of listening to it all, and watching the performers. Silence would be infinitely better."

Professor Esolen, may I safely infer that there are times during mass that you're not a happy worshipper?

;-)

Posted by: Truth Unites... and Divides | Jul 25, 2007 11:29:15 AM

Wow, V-Dawg - that one is amazing!

Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Jul 25, 2007 11:49:09 AM

The liturgical dancers would heartily agree with Tertullian's " "The flesh is the hinge of salvation," insofar as they wish for us all to "get in touch with our bodies," and use our bodies in worship. Why then should we not bend our knees and kneel and prostrate? That represents the humbling and subjection of the flesh to God, rather than its own glorification. If we are to affirm that the flesh is the hinge of salvation, that is, to affirm the Incarnation, and God's embodiment as fully Man, then, by all means we should lift high the Cross and bring our bodies into submission. But the so-called "spirit of Vatican II" that drives the liturgical dancers makes them avert their eyes or even flee from the Cross. That in itself is enough to suggest the identity of that spirit. It does not rejoice in the Incarnation, but sees the body as a casing and puppet of the real self, a disposable instrument of the immaterial Psyche, a mere whirlwind of signs that may be played with and reordered and redesigned at our own will.

Posted by: Little Gidding | Jul 25, 2007 11:56:53 AM

"Can you hear us?
Can you feel?"

Sung to the tune of "Tommy" by The Who? That Jesus ... the deaf, dumb, and blind kid ... locked inside that useless body ... sure plays a mean pinball.

Posted by: Little Gidding | Jul 25, 2007 12:11:40 PM

Post a comment