« A Net Gain for Mankind? | Main | "Jesus III" »
February 21, 2008
Erin Go Bragh
Thanks to Greg Laughlin for sending this article on the "dilemma" facing Irish organizations that want to celebrate Saint Patrick's Day this year on the usual feast day, March 17. Since Easter is as early this year as it can possibly be, March 17 falls on the Monday of Holy Week, a most inopportune time for lavish celebration, as Catholics are supposed to be preparing themselves for the solemn events of the Last Supper and the Crucifixion. Indeed, at Mass on the day before, Palm Sunday, they will have heard the reading of the entire passion from one of the synoptic gospels, beginning with Christ's triumphant entry into Jerusalem and concluding with His burial.
So Catholics in some of the American dioceses will be moving the celebrations forward to the Saturday before Palm Sunday. But that's offensive to some Irish American groups. As the leader of one organization said, it's as if the bishops were to order the NFL to change the date of the Super Bowl. Of course it is nothing like that; there's no analogy at all. Saint Patrick's Day is a Catholic feast day, a minor feast in most countries, but, naturally, a much-noted feast in America and Ireland. If the feast were to fall on Good Friday (an impossibility, but suppose it could, for the sake of argument), would the organizers still insist on wearing green and parading half drunk down Main Street and singing boisterous songs? At the least, you'd think they might show some consideration for their fellow Irishmen who take their Catholicism seriously. They might say, "Not that it means much to me, as it's been that long since I've darkened a church door, but Paddy, now, it doesn't sit right on his stomach." These are, after all, the Irish who used to teach their children to make the sign of the cross every time they passed by a church, in honor of the Savior who died to set them free.
That is not even to mention the very meaning of the day, for the Irish nation. Saint Patrick's claim on the hearts of the Irish -- if indeed it is Saint Patrick they are honoring, and not just a name or a geographical location -- is that he brought them the Christian faith, driving from the land the serpents of druidical superstitions and human sacrifice. With that faith came Roman (and sometimes Greek; John the Scot from Ireland was almost the only Western man of his day who studied it) learning, and such evangelistic fervor from the Irish monasteries that western Europe itself was in large part saved, for the faith and for civilization itself, by those Irish outposts from beyond the seas.
People will argue, though, that the celebration is "cultural," not religious. There are of course a lot of things that are cultural though not, strictly speaking, religious: baseball used to be such a thing in the United States. But I don't sense that that's the case here. We don't have something to which the Irish consider themselves honor-bound to uphold, something whose beauty or essential meaning helps to shape their beliefs about the world and how it works and their own place in it. You can say, "I love baseball; it's the great American sport; it unites Albert Pujols with Lou Gehrig with Dan Brouthers," and so on. But it's hard to say, "I want to celebrate Saint Patrick's Day, but I want it to have nothing to do with Saints or Patrick or any Church." That would represent not a demotion from religion to culture, but a demotion from both the cultural and religious to a kind of niche marketing, or niche purchasing. The same phenomenon has occurred with self-styled "cultural" Jews. If that is what you are -- if the Seder is just a nice family meal, and Kaddish the traditional thing you say when somebody has died -- then you are not really a Jew, and you're well on your way to having no culture, either.
What Saint Patrick did mean to the Irish, though, is well captured in this famous hymn, whose lyrics many an Irishman could not now sing without choking on his whiskey:
All praise to Saint Patrick, who brought to our mountains
The gift of God's faith, the sweet light of His love.
All praise to the Shepherd who showed us the fountains
That rise in the Heart of the Saviour above.
For hundreds of years,
In smiles and in tears,
Our Saint hath been with us, our shield and our stay;
All else may have gone,
Saint Patrick alone.
He hath been to us light, when earth's lights were all set,
For the glories of faith they can never decay,
And the best of our glories is bright with us yet,
in the faith and the feast of Saint Patrick's day.
There is not a Saint in the bright courts of heaven,
More faithful than he to the land of his choice;
Oh well may the nation to whom he was given,
In the feast of their Sire and apostle rejoice.
In Glory above
True to his love,
He keeps the false faith from his children away.
The dark false faith
Far worse than death,
Oh he drives it far off from the green sunny shore,
Like the reptiles that fled from his curse in dismay,
And Erin when error's proud triumph is o'er,
Will still be found keeping Saint Patrick's day.
Then what shall we do for the heaven sent father?
What shall the proof of our loyalty be?
By all that is dear to our hearts we would rather
Be martyred, sweet Saint, than bring shame upon thee.
But oh, he will take
The promise we make,
So to live that our lives by God's help, may display
The light that he bore
To Erin's shore.
Oh, Father of Ireland! no son wilt thou own
Whose life is not lighted by grace on its way;
For they are true Irish, ah yes, they alone,
Whose hearts are all true on Saint Patrick's day.
Posted by Anthony Esolen at 11:14 AM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5ee953ef00e5507356db8834
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Erin Go Bragh:
Comments
I believe the Irish bishops moved the Feast of St. Patrick to March 15th this year. I beleive it ranks as a solemnity in Ireland because he is the patron of the country.
In America, it will be supressed outright. There is no basis for moving it. Holy Week clearly takes precedence.
I would imagine that for many of the faithful there will be some cultural commemoration of St. Pat on the 15th, I'm planning some myself. But I do not expect any religious commemoration of St. Pat in the US at all this year. It wouldn't be fitting.
Posted by: ben | Feb 21, 2008 12:16:36 PM
But even if you move the Feast of St. Patrick to March 15, it still falls during Lent and the incongruity remains. Instead shouldn't it be moved to a day in the week following Easter?
Posted by: Bill R | Feb 21, 2008 12:36:30 PM
Bill R,
I think it falls in Lent every year. There is a special dispensation, or so I believe.
Posted by: Wonders for Oyarsa | Feb 21, 2008 1:17:17 PM
I have a hard time with this one. I strive each Lent--I've only got four under my belt thus far--to observe the Church's discipline insofar as I'm required to abstain from flesh meat on Lenten Fridays. It's really not that hard not to eat meat. I mean, you just eat something else. Last year, then, I was completely furious about American bishops dispensing with this particular form of disciplinary sacrifice because St. Patrick's fell on a Friday in Lent. Couldn't those Irish just 'corn' some fish or vegetables? Sheesh.
But, in a staggering, slumbering stupor early that Friday morning, I woke up and pounded some cold bacon and bean tacos from the day before. 'Mmm, so tasty. Wait, what day is it? *%$@!! I can't even discipline my greedy mouth so as not to devour every tasty morsel in sight.' Felt like a loser all morning. I prayed God would overlook my failure to discipline myself for the sake of His Son, who'd died for us on a Friday.
Until I read the papers--and found the closest thing to a sign of His forgiveness. Our bishop--no pushover, mind you, far beyond dispensing with discipline for some cultural nonsense--had also granted a dispensation (provided that some other disciplinary sacrifice took the place of not eating meat).
So while this isn't the same issue, I don't really know where I stand on this year's St. Patrick's day dilemma.
Posted by: Jason in San Antonio | Feb 21, 2008 4:49:58 PM
(But, on a side note, wouldn't it be awesome if the American bishops told the NFL to move the Super Bowl?)
Posted by: Jason in San Antonio | Feb 21, 2008 4:54:44 PM
Do normal St. Patrick's Day celebrations begin with a solemn Mass? I'm not Catholic so I'm actually not sure.
Posted by: Street Theologian | Feb 21, 2008 5:16:42 PM
Since I cannot find regulations for observing Lent in the Scriptures, God has not seen fit to establish such laws, and we dare not exalt ourselves above Him.
But even if that were not so, Monday in Holy Week is still a time of celebration, carried over from Palm Sunday. Jesus is still celebrated as the Son of David by the mob. Drunkenness is never fitting, but trad music and dancing, thanks to God for sending the word of the Gospel, all of those seem quite fitting for Monday of Holy Week.
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 21, 2008 6:05:33 PM
I think we need to teach people some good ol' penitential Irish chants on March 17th, followed by some barefoot walks up mountains, staying up all night while eating and drinking nothing, and walking around on cold damp pebbly pilgrim paths (still barefoot) come morning on Tuesday. NOW THAT'S IRISH!
However, it would seem from what I've read elsewhere that the rubrics here in America call for the Annunciation, St. Patrick's Day, and St. Joseph's Day all to get moved _after_ Lent. So where St. Patrick's Day is being celebrated in this country, it will be celebrated April 1. (No foolin'.)
Posted by: Maureen | Feb 21, 2008 8:13:12 PM
>>Since I cannot find regulations for observing Lent in the Scriptures, God has not seen fit to establish such laws, and we dare not exalt ourselves above Him.
Careful, now. Nobody's claiming the RC liturgical calendar is a matter of divine law.
>>I believe the Irish bishops moved the Feast of St. Patrick to March 15th this year.
This is already a concession to "cultural" forces. Roman convention is to *postpone* a translated feast day (when such a translation is deemed necessary) until the next available liturgical date -- in this case, it'd be the Monday after the Octave of Easter, or possibly the Tuesday, since the Solemnity of the Annunciation will also be translated. To move the feast *ahead* two days is a true curiosity.
Posted by: DGP | Feb 21, 2008 8:13:14 PM
After Holy Week and the Octave of Easter, that is.
Posted by: Maureen | Feb 21, 2008 8:14:06 PM
Folks, my point is not really whether St. Patrick's Day should be celebrated on the Monday of Holy Week this year (St. Pat's day will not fall in Holy Week again until the year 2160). It is that the day no longer seems to mean much of anything to quite a few of the Irish, here and in Ireland. What I'm criticizing is that utterly unfounded assumption that you can have a culture at all without an eye to what transcends your place and time. So, in America, if you are celebrating the Fourth of July without a thought about the meaning of the Revolution, you're not doing much of anything -- and eventually the celebrations will die out, as they have in most places for Memorial Day. If you're Irish and you're celebrating Saint Patrick's Day, and you cast contempt upon the faith of Saint Patrick, and upon your forefathers whom he united in the faith, then I don't know what you're celebrating, finally. Having a funny accent and liking James Joyce?
Labrialum,
Lent -- as you doubtless know -- is the season that the Church has established to help remind us of the forty years in the desert, and Christ's forty days of fast and prayer. It is, start to finish, deeply scriptural, and, more than that, eschatological in its arc from the Fall to Easter.
Posted by: Tony Esolen | Feb 21, 2008 9:38:17 PM
Right, it is thoroughly soaked in Scripture. It is not wrong. But Scripture does not set up a series of commands for observance, or even mention it, so it is technically adiaphora. I didn't mean to imply more than that.
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 21, 2008 10:56:59 PM
"These are, after all, the Irish who used to teach their children to make the sign of the cross every time they passed by a church, in honor of the Savior who died to set them free."
Yes, I am one of those taught to, and still do, make the sign of the cross in passing a Catholic church. However, it is not so much to just honor our Saviour but, more importantly, to respect the Real Presence of Our Lord reposed in the Tabernacle.
Posted by: Brian Schuettler | Feb 22, 2008 8:55:38 AM
"But Scripture does not set up a series of commands for observance, or even mention it, so it is technically adiaphora."
Nice that you've taken it upon yourself to determine what's adiaphora and what isn't. Care to prove your methodology from Scripture?
"But even if that were not so, Monday in Holy Week is still a time of celebration, carried over from Palm Sunday. Jesus is still celebrated as the Son of David by the mob. Drunkenness is never fitting, but trad music and dancing, thanks to God for sending the word of the Gospel, all of those seem quite fitting for Monday of Holy Week."
They may seem so, but they're not. E and W both consider Passion week to be penitential in nature, not celebratory.
Posted by: Rob G | Feb 22, 2008 11:13:25 AM
I was once at a friend's annual St. Patrick's Day corned-beef-and-cabbage dinner, when the host casually asked, "So what did St. Partick do anyway?" There was general grunted ignorance among the guests until the host noticed me, the ethnic Sicilian and go-to Catholic, sitting with my mouth open. I had to explain that whole conversion-of-the-Irish thing to the assembled masses of Erin's great-grandsons.
Posted by: Steve | Feb 22, 2008 1:07:22 PM
What is most striking to me about all this is Irish loyalty to a man who was not even an Irishman, a centuries-long returning of love and thanks to a foreigner who loved them and gave himself for them. This has always seemed to me a most wonderful thing, a most Christian thing, something of spectacular beauty that other Christians would do very well to contemplate--along with the deep truth of the tradition that he drove the serpents out of Ireland.
Posted by: smh | Feb 22, 2008 3:21:25 PM
Rob, Luther and Melancton already did. I refer you to their works :-)
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 22, 2008 11:13:54 PM
But what's the tune ????
Please.
Posted by: Fr D | Feb 23, 2008 3:03:53 AM
>>Luther and Melancton already did. I refer you to their works :-)
I thought it was faith, not works. :)
Posted by: DGP | Feb 23, 2008 8:23:20 AM
Fr. D, you will find that printed in your bulletin insert, complete with chanting marks. :-)
DGP :-P
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 23, 2008 10:24:32 AM
"Rob, Luther and Melancton already did. I refer you to their works."
Been there, done that, got the t-shirt. Far too convenient.
Posted by: Rob G | Feb 23, 2008 11:23:09 AM
Article 15 of the Smalcald Articles. The Church dare not make human rules which are made out to be necessary to salvation.
Rob, just as the two main halves of the divided church speak here, so also the faith of the Undivided Church speak.`If you've ever read Luther's exposition of the 10 Commandments in the Large Catechism, you would not find convenience, but a deep examination of your conscience.
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 23, 2008 5:50:18 PM
Just a word - Easter can fall as early as March 22 (my birthday), but last did so in the late 1800's and will not do so again in my lifetime.
Posted by: Mark B, Hanson | Feb 23, 2008 6:16:43 PM
>>Article 15 of the Smalcald Articles. The Church dare not make human rules which are made out to be necessary to salvation.
A few too many ironies in the fire here, I think.
>>Rob, just as the two main halves of the divided church speak here, so also the faith of the Undivided Church speak.
Ah, the two main halves. Aren't the other halves represented? :)
Posted by: DGP | Feb 23, 2008 9:12:55 PM
A Saint's feast day is the day s/he is recorded as having "fallen asleep in the hope of resurrection". Whatever is done with the celebration, it does not change the fact that St.Patrick is remembered as having died on the eighteenth of March. No doubt he would not have minded having some extra time to celebrate Easter with his flock - he was called to the everlasting Easter instead. So we should accept both things: fast for Our Lord in the expectation of the Day of Resurrection, and celebrate His "legate to the Irish", as Patrick described himself. As for food, I have a suggestion: salmon is both a very Irish fish and a superb fare for celebration. Why not use it for St.Patrick's day?
Posted by: Fabio P.Barbieri | Feb 24, 2008 5:45:32 AM
>>Article 15 of the Smalcald Articles. The Church dare not make human rules which are made out to be necessary to salvation.<<
"A few too many ironies in the fire here, I think." -- DGP
Ain't that the truth. The first among which might be whether adherence to Article 15 is necessary for salvation.
Posted by: Rob G | Feb 24, 2008 2:21:04 PM
>The first among which might be whether adherence to Article 15 is necessary for salvation.
I would say not. But still a rather good idea...
Posted by: David Gray | Feb 24, 2008 3:19:34 PM
"I would say not. But still a rather good idea..."
'No man-made rules shall be held as necessary for salvation. It is necessary for salvation that this rule be followed.'
This begins to sound like a Monty Python sketch. Rule No. 5: No poofters!
Posted by: Rob G | Feb 24, 2008 3:34:22 PM
Well, if humor and silliness are all the argument you have, then I guess we must be in agreement :-)
Now, St. Patrick passed on on March 18, you say. But that was the old calendar, no doubt, and days would have slipped between his time and the change to the new calendar, so, considering that, when does the commemoration of his passing on, actually occur?
Posted by: labrialumn | Feb 25, 2008 9:39:45 PM
"Well, if humor and silliness are all the argument you have..."
That's all the response some things merit.
Posted by: Rob G | Feb 26, 2008 3:22:44 PM
Great site you have!
Would you like a Link Exchange with The Internet Radio Network? At the IRN you can listen for free to over 60 of Americas top Talk Shows via Free Streaming Audio...
http://netradionetwork.com
Posted by: Steve | Feb 28, 2008 10:26:59 AM
St Patrick feast day celebration of a young English missionary spreading the WORD of GOD is harmonious with the Church's veneration of historical Holy conversions within and abroad of Ireland.
The drunken debauchery taken place was/is never intended by Church teaching or practice.
Tavern owners and the raucous revelers would have the whole world believe otherwise.
Posted by: George | Mar 19, 2008 12:20:39 PM








Recent Comments
Bloggers
Popular Threads
Archives
OLD ARCHIVES 2002-2004
From May 2002–December 2004, Mere Comments was published via Blogger.com. Every post is still available at the link above.
Member since 12/2004