Spring Into Action Fundraising Drive

Thanks to all our Touchstone and Salvo friends who responded so generously and helped us surpass our goal!
God bless you all.











WWW Mere Comments





« Shipment Today | Main | Touchstone Editor in Colorado »

April 17, 2008

Welcome, Life, Sort Of, Pope Benedict

The Senate apparently doesn't want to value whatever they veiw as every human life. From the Crypt:

While Pope Benedict XVI's historic visit to Washington received wall to wall coverage, Sen. Barbara Boxer briefly held up a Senate resolution welcoming the pontiff because she objected to language about how the pope values "each and every human life."

The measure later cleared the Senate Thursday afternoon after the sponsor of the resolution, Sen. Sam Brownback (R-Kan.), dropped the reference to "human life" because some Democrats saw it as a reference to abortion.

I fail to see why the phrase should have been dropped: if some Democrats admit that an abortion takes a human life, and they support abortion, then I guess they would object. But if they think a human life is something that appears at birth, then they should be able to comfort themselves that their statement to the Pope is not about anything in utero. Of course it's hard to maintain such ignorance in the face of all the facts. I'm sure the Holy Father will frame the Pelosi version for his office.

Posted by James M. Kushiner at 03:31 PM | Permalink

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5ee953ef00e551f295d88834

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Welcome, Life, Sort Of, Pope Benedict:

Comments

Schizophrenia is the hallmark of the pro-choice movement. The law in many states defines unborn embryos as human life with respect to assaults thereon by a third-party, but then ignores such definitions when the assaulting party is the mother or a "physician."

Posted by: Bill R | Apr 17, 2008 5:04:01 PM

There was a time when such an action as that of Boxer would result in interdict.

Posted by: Sodbuster | Apr 17, 2008 6:42:36 PM

>>>There was a time when such an action as that of Boxer would result in interdict.<<<

Yeah, but after the five hundredth time, it sort of lost its impact. That's what happens when you go to the well too often.

Posted by: Stuart Koehl | Apr 17, 2008 7:33:18 PM

Interesting. I think your argument is spot on, and that the Democrats also would say they value every human life. The definitions of, rather than the words, "human" and "life" are what divide us.

Posted by: Bob Siletzky | Apr 18, 2008 12:27:15 AM

No, what divides us is rather the difference between people who slaughter babies, and the people who either actively support them or are indifferent, and the people who condemn slaughtering babies and work to 1) save as many as possible from the arms of Moloch and 2) change the law so that every human life (without the scare quotes) is protected in law from conception until natural death.

Posted by: Michael D. Harmon | Apr 18, 2008 5:56:33 AM

Post a comment