« Revising Lewis | Main | O Tempora, O Mores! »
August 04, 2008
Solzhenitsyn: Voice in the Wildernesses
Everyone, no doubt, has heard of the passing of Alexander Solzhenitsyn this weekend. In 2001, I wrote a bit about him in a fundraising letter, reflecting on Joseph Pearce's then-new book, Alexander Solzhenitsyn: A Soul in Exile (Baker Books, 2001):
[Pearce] writes about the earthquake set off by the publication of Solzhenitsyn’s One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich just a month after the Cuban missile crisis. Novy Mir (New World) published the novel in November 1962 with the approval of the Soviet government, including the hearty support of Nikita Kruschev. Little did they know what they were getting themselves into!
The book was an instant sell-out and went immediately into a second printing. Solzhenitsyn, an unknown writer, a schoolteacher who had served an eight-year sentence in the gulag for making disparaging comments about Stalin in letters to a friend, became an instant celebrity. Letters poured in from former political prisoners, elated that someone had told the truth about Stalin’s slave-labor camps. Pearce writes:
Clearly One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich had touched a raw nerve. As its impact resounded throughout the Soviet Union, from the grandeur of the Kremlin to the humble homes of former prisoners, Solzhenitsyn contemplated the power his novel had unleashed. “If the first tiny droplet of truth has exploded like a psychological bomb, what then will happen in our country when whole waterfalls of Truth burst forth?”
After 1962 the flow of truth continued. Solzhenitsyn, with the help of many friends and allies, continued to publish, often underground, prior to his forced exile in 1974. The cracks created in the Soviet regime by the labors of Solzhenitsyn and his friends eventually combined with other forces—Solzhenitsyn gives much credit to John Paul II—to bring about the Soviet collapse.
We at Touchstone share Solzhenitsyn’s wonder at the power of truth in the face of lies. But truth doesn’t always gain a hearing easily. Today we face a struggle that Solzhenitsyn saw clearly enough during his exile in the West. For our culture and society have fallen prey to the demons of materialism, secularism, and consumerism—all built on lies about God and man.
Pearce writes, “In essence, [Solzhenitsyn] said, both [capitalism and socialism] have common materialistic roots and are therefore, of necessity, at loggerheads with Christianity.” The British journalist Malcolm Muggeridge approvingly described Solzhenitsyn as seeing “western man as sleepwalking into the selfsame servitude that in the Soviet Union has been imposed by force.” Marxism may be almost gone, but secular materialism is in firm control in many places—including the former Soviet Union.
Thus Touchstone’s task is not easy: articulating timeless truths of Christ and his Church in a culture (and sadly, often in churches) crippled by a secularized worldview and its accompanying moral relativism. This is a hard labor that needs many voices. Indeed, the task of telling the truth is a calling larger than any one person or one journal. We, thank God, are only one of many and are glad that we are not alone.
If you have been reading Touchstone for a while, we hope you will agree that we are playing a part in speaking Truth against the darkness.
Alexander Solzhenitsyn: May his memory be eternal!
A PS to Our Allies: Thank you for your very generous support this past year! We would not be publishing without it. The summer months are very "dry" months in terms of revenues. We very much need your contributions at this time. But above all, please remember us in your prayers.
Posted by James M. Kushiner at 02:47 PM | Permalink
TrackBack
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d8341c5ee953ef00e553cd42f78833
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Solzhenitsyn: Voice in the Wildernesses:
Comments
So how do Solzhenitsyn's convictions square with our divinely-ordained mission to propagate "democratic capitalism" throughout the world?
Posted by: G.S. | Aug 6, 2008 4:36:56 PM
Thank the Lord. Another Democrat. I thought I was the only one.
But to the man we mourn, although the Red Wheel is disparaged by critics, it has lines like,
What a salutary human trait it is that the worse things become, the readier people are to laugh. [The war] was no laughing matter--but you couldn't help laughing.
Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, November 1916
Posted by: Neil Gussman | Aug 6, 2008 7:12:41 PM
Actually I'm no Democrat, Mr. Gussman, just a non-neocon -- but best wishes to you too.
I've only read *Ivan Denisovich*, *Lenin In Zurich*, excerpts from *Gulag*, and a collection of his short stories, but they're enough to confirm in my book that the man's literary reputation alongside Dostoevsky & Gogol was well-earned. I found his Harvard address pretty much spot-on, as well.
Couple of good recent articles on Solzhenitsyn -- one, biographical:
http://www.takimag.com/site/article/the_soul_barbed_wire/
And the other on the grudge held against him by neoconservatives and their fellow-travelers:
http://www.chroniclesmagazine.org/?p=687#more-687
Posted by: G.S. | Aug 7, 2008 3:32:21 PM
GS--You're book? What's the title? Sorry to be so long in posting.
Neil
Posted by: Neil Gussman | Aug 17, 2008 6:47:24 PM
>>>And the other on the grudge held against him by neoconservatives and their fellow-travelers<<<
I don't suppose you've actually read any of the tributes offered to Solzhenitsyn by numerous "neo-conservatives" both before and after his death? Frankly, I don't see any "grudge" on their part, assuming that one could even come to a coherent definition of neo-conservative (other than "Jews and the rest of Israel's 'Amen Corner' working in the Bush Administration). So-called neo-cons were among the only people actually taking seriously Solzhenitsyn's call for the moral regeneration of the West (as well as Russia).
But none of that should blind us to Solzhenitsyn own blind spots. The man was, to his very bone, a Russian chauvinist, a real believer in the destiny of Russia as "Third Rome"--if only Russia could get its spiritual house in order so that it would be worthy of such an exalted place. Indeed, the great lover of human freedom could not find it within himself to give approval to the desire for independence from Russia by Ukraine, Georgia, the Baltics and even Belarus. For him, it was indeed Russia's role in the world to be leader of all the Slavs, and he could never, for the life of him, understand why they might not quite see it that way.
Posted by: Stuart Koehl | Aug 17, 2008 7:42:32 PM








Recent Comments
Bloggers
Popular Threads
Archives
OLD ARCHIVES 2002-2004
From May 2002–December 2004, Mere Comments was published via Blogger.com. Every post is still available at the link above.
Member since 12/2004