Rules for Science Journalists

There are few things that writers at sites like this one and I agree on when it comes to the intelligent design vs no-intelligence-needed controversy. But here is something we do agree on: writing about science accurately. The headlines often accompanying science stories are misleading at best and dishonest at worst. The example given here about an "infertility gene" is right on. There is no such thing. Read the stories and you'll find the headline lied or hyped. Hats off to Myers for this.